Back to Blog
innovation programs

Hackathons vs Design Sprints vs Accelerators: Choosing the Right Format

Each innovation format solves a different problem. Here's how to match the format to your actual needs.

Matthieu Bodin
December 15, 2024
2 min read

"We should run a hackathon" is often the answer to a question no one asked clearly. Before choosing a format, you need to understand what problem you're actually solving.

The Formats at a Glance

Hackathons

Best for: Generating ideas, building culture, engaging employees across silos.

Duration: 1-5 days

What you get: Many rough ideas, energy and enthusiasm, cross-functional connections.

What you don't get: Validated concepts, implementation-ready solutions, certainty about market fit.

Use when: You need fresh thinking, want to engage employees in innovation, or need to shake up calcified organizational thinking.

Design Sprints

Best for: Rapidly testing a specific concept or solving a defined problem.

Duration: 4-5 days

What you get: A testable prototype, real user feedback, clear direction on a specific challenge.

What you don't get: Broad idea generation, cultural transformation, multiple options to choose from.

Use when: You have a specific problem to solve and need to move from concept to user feedback quickly.

Accelerators

Best for: Developing promising concepts into validated ventures over time.

Duration: 8-16 weeks

What you get: Structured validation, mentorship, accountability milestones, venture-building skills.

What you don't get: Quick wins, broad engagement, idea generation.

Use when: You have concepts worth investing in and need structured support to validate and develop them.

The Decision Framework

Start with your goal, not the format:

"We need new ideas" → Hackathon
"We need to test this specific concept" → Design Sprint
"We need to develop these promising opportunities" → Accelerator

Common Mistakes

The most frequent error I see: running a hackathon when you need an accelerator, or vice versa. Organizations run hackathons to feel innovative, then wonder why nothing gets implemented. Or they jump to an accelerator without enough raw material to work with.

The second mistake: not committing appropriate resources. A hackathon needs less investment than an accelerator, but an accelerator delivers more substantive outcomes. Match your resource commitment to your actual goals.

The Bottom Line

Format follows function. Define what success looks like before choosing how to get there.

hackathonsdesign sprintsacceleratorsprogram design

Want to discuss your innovation challenge?

Let's talk about how these ideas apply to your situation.

Schedule a Call

Continue Reading